The Surprising Discovery
You discovered that one of your remote employees has been quietly juggling two other full-time remote jobs. Neither one of those companies compete directly with yours, and your employee’s performance hasn’t obviously slipped. Still, something about this doesn’t feel quite right. You now wonder if this is acceptable behavior, a breach of trust, or simply a new reality in remote work culture.
Why This Situation Feels Complicated
This scenario sits in a gray area. On the one hand, the employee can argue that they’re meeting expectations and harming no one. But on the other hand, most employers are operating under the assumption that full-time roles require full-time commitment. Your concern is more centered on fairness, productivity, and whether the expectations were fully defined and understood from the start.
Understand “Overemployment”
This practice, often called “overemployment,” has actually grown in recent years alongside the growth of remote work. Employees take on multiple full-time roles at the same time, without always necessarily informing their employers. This practice thrives in environments where output is a priority over hours worked. Understanding this trend helps you guide your response as part of a broader shift rather than an isolated incident.
Review The Employment Agreement
Your first step is to revisit the employee’s contract. Look for any clauses about exclusivity, conflicts of interest, or outside employment. Some agreements explicitly prohibit additional full-time work, while others remain silent. The language and exact wording of this document will be a key factor in whether the employee has violated a formal obligation or simply an unspoken expectation.
Assess Performance Objectively
Before you fly off the handle and overreact, take a long hard look at the employee’s performance. Are they meeting deadlines, producing quality work, showing up to meetings, and collaborating effectively? If their output is strong, the issue is less about capability and more about principle. But if you find that the performance is slipping, you have clearer grounds to address the situation directly and promptly.
Considering Ethical Expectations
Even if having multiple jobs isn’t strictly prohibited, holding down multiple full-time jobs raises some ethical questions. You may feel that the employee isn’t fully committed to your organization. From your point of view, a full-time job implies complete focus and availability. Deciding where you stand ethically will be the biggest factor in how you respond.
Evaluate Business Impact
Try to think past the individual involved and take into account the broader impact. Could this behavior have an effect on team morale if discovered? Would others feel justified in doing the same? If the answer is yes, then the issue becomes a cultural one, not just a personal matter between you and the employee.
Clarify Your Company’s Policy
If your organization has no clear policy on outside employment, then this situation is an obvious red flag of the need for one. Any ambiguity on this matter creates inconsistent expectations and outcomes for your entire staff. Setting out a formal stance will help you deal with this case fairly while preventing confusion or similar situations in the future.
Initiate A Conversation
Approach the employee directly but professionally. Don’t point the finger and start making accusations; instead focus on understanding their perspective. Ask some open-ended questions about their workload, availability, and how they manage their responsibilities. This conversation can potentially tell you a lot about whether or not the situation is manageable or if it’s already creating strain.
Listen To Their Justification
The employee may tell you that financial pressures, career growth, or job security concerns were what motivated their decision. While these reasons may not justify their actions, they do offer some context. Understanding their rationale helps you respond with clarity rather than just reacting from frustration.
Address Trust Concerns
Trust is often the central issue in these situations. Even if the employee’s performance is acceptable, secrecy can harm the employer-employee relationship. You have to determine whether this breach of transparency undermines your confidence in their reliability and long-term place within your organization.
Set Clear Expectations
After gathering information, set out a clear outline of your expectations moving forward. This could include limiting outside employment, requiring disclosure, or reinforcing availability standards. But you have to be specific about what is acceptable and what isn’t, so there is no ambiguity going forward.
Consider The Legal Implications
In some jurisdictions, restrictions on outside employment may be limited. Make sure that any action you take complies with the employment laws in your region. Overly restrictive policies can sometimes be challenged, especially if they interfere with an employee’s ability to make a living.
Balance Flexibility And Control
Remote work has shifted the balance of power toward flexibility. You end up having to come to a decision on how much control you want to have over employees’ time versus their productivity. Striking the right balance can help you retain talent while maintaining a sound operation.
Decide On Consequences
If the employee violated a clear policy, disciplinary action may be in order. This could range from a warning to termination, depending on severity. But if no policy was clearly breached, you may be wise to choose a softer approach focused on alignment of current and future expectations rather than punishment.
Communicate With The Team
If this situation becomes known to the rest of your work force, you may need to address it with your team. Transparency helps to curtail speculation and resentment. Without sharing unnecessary details, reinforce company policies and expectations to maintain trust and cohesion within your workforce.
Update Internal Policies
Use this experience to beef up your policies. Clearly define your expectations around outside employment, working hours, and disclosure requirements. A well-written policy not only protects your organization but also helps your employees by giving them a clear understanding of boundaries.
Monitor Moving Forward
Once you’ve addressed the issue, and in the weeks and months afterward, keep an eye on performance and engagement. Make sure that agreed-upon expectations are being met consistently. Regular check-ins can help you detect early signs of strain or disengagement before they turn into larger problems.
Weigh Retention Vs Risk
If the employee is highly valuable, you may decide that keeping him/her on board with clear boundaries is worth the risk. If trust has been significantly damaged, you may conclude that the relationship is no longer sustainable. That’s a decision that depends entirely on both the worker’s performance and your tolerance for uncertainty.
What Should You Do Now?
Ultimately, this situation that requires a balanced response. You always need to make your decision-making congruent with company policy, legal considerations, and your own leadership values. Address the issue directly, clarify your expectations, and tighten up your policies, and you can turn a confusing dilemma into a structured and manageable outcome.
You May Also Like:
Some White Collar Employees Are Working Two Full-Time Jobs At Once
